Has history been tampered with? Did events and eras such as the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, the Roman Empire , the Dark Ages, and the Renaissance, actually occur within a very different chronology from what we've been told? Yes, they certainly did! The history of humankind is both drastically shorter and dramatically different than generally presumed. Why is it so? On one hand, it was usual custom to justify the claims to title and land by age and ancestry, and on the other the court historians knew only too well how to please their masters. The so called universal classic world history is a pack of intricate lies for all events prior to the 16th century. It's likely that nobody told you before, but there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artefact that is reliably and independently dated prior to the 11th century.Naturally, after what you've learned in school and university, you will not easily believe that the classical history of ancient Rome, Greece, Asia, Egypt, China, Japan, India, etc., is manifestly false. You will point accusing finger to the pyramids in Egypt, to the Coliseum in Rome and Great Wall of China etc., and claim, aren't they really ancient, thousands of years ancient? Well, there is no valid scientific proof that they are older than 1000 years! The oldest original written document that can be reliably dated belongs to the 11th century! New research asserts that Homo sapiens invented writing (including hieroglyphics) only 1000 years ago. Once invented, writing skills were immediately and irreversibly put to the use of ruling powers and science. The consensual chronology we live with was essentially crafted in the 16th century by Jesuits. Early in life, we learn by heart the names and deeds of brave warriors, wise philosophers, fabulous pharaohs, cunning high priests and greedy scribes. We learn of gigantic pyramids and sinister castles, kings and queens, dukes and barons, powerful heroes and beautiful ladies, emaciated saints and low-life traitors. Dr debunks not merely the odd pillar, but the total, entire bastion of historical dating, proposing a 700 to 1000 year fictitious "add-on" section between 400 AD and 1100 AD (or larger) & argues that the conventional chronology sequence of almost EVERYTHING is erroneous. Even if partially true this would be scary stuff. Forget forbidden archeology which is for kindergarten....
Canal: Travel & Events Subido: 08/04/07 a las 9:45 am Autor: mithec
Duración: 08:51 Valoración: N/A Vistas: 556364
Metatron wzz (el 18/05/13 a las 5:41 pm)
LOL, ratings disabled... hmm I wonder why? This is retarded.
Brandon Hall (el 09/05/13 a las 9:18 pm)
Noah Streetman (el 29/04/13 a las 9:02 pm)
i beleive you
HunGyilok (el 26/04/13 a las 7:06 am)
for that were mad the wars to hide this shits and make up the present day 'history'from 18 century's wars to 20th are for that
HunGyilok (el 26/04/13 a las 6:24 am)
Truenothing from so called ' noted history' from ' bc 700 aproxx' is true
MsOlmec (el 25/04/13 a las 7:48 pm)
this is a bad joke.
elfoxy1997 (el 23/04/13 a las 4:04 pm)
Where do I recognize your picture from?
Mark Banks (el 23/04/13 a las 1:26 pm)
TheKnoxVillain1 (el 13/04/13 a las 4:28 pm)
The only time someone disables the rating system on their video, is because they are too immature to listen to everyone tell them how bat shit their idea is.